NFAs are cheaper to construct, but have a O(n*m) matching time, where n is the size of the input and m is the size of the state graph. NFAs are often seen as the reasonable middle ground, but i disagree and will argue that NFAs are worse than the other two. they are theoretically “linear”, but in practice they do not perform as well as DFAs (in the average case they are also much slower than backtracking). they spend the complexity in the wrong place - why would i want matching to be slow?! that’s where most of the time is spent. the problem is that m can be arbitrarily large, and putting a large constant of let’s say 1000 on top of n will make matching 1000x slower. just not acceptable for real workloads, the benchmarks speak for themselves here.
Самарский клуб Российской премьер-лиги (РПЛ) «Крылья Советов» два месяца не выплачивает зарплату футболистам и сотрудникам команды. Об этом стало известно Sport Baza.，更多细节参见下载安装 谷歌浏览器 开启极速安全的 上网之旅。
，详情可参考体育直播
Trump summoned tech leaders to the White House on Wednesday, March 4, 2026 to sign pledges committing their companies to foot the electricity bill for energy-hungry data centers. | Photo: Getty Images，这一点在谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】中也有详细论述
На МКАД загорелись две машины14:46
inMemoryModelWithDescriptor:desc];